Each discipline checked its own

Anyone who runs interdisciplinary reviews knows it. Each discipline has checked its own, and the package still doesn't fit. A profile moved in one model, a drawing stayed on the old revision, and nobody had the week to find it, so it waits for the meeting.

One case on our Try page: Design Package 2 for an underpass. Yesper cross-read the package and sorted the findings by when they must be closed. The busiest pair was mostly one cause: the sheets had renumbered the cables, the schedule hadn't. The one for the meeting: 16'-1" under the bridge in the model, criterion 16'-6".

The meeting goes to the decisions, roadway grade or bridge grade, not to an outdated cable schedule. The interface findings land a week early, not in the submittal comments. Same for the rest of the Try page: reissued sheets against the bid set, a bridge coordination model.

Try it yourself →

Benjamin Glaser Co-founder at Yesper. Writes about AI and the industry that builds the world. benjamin@yesper.ai

Yesper is the AI civil engineer for construction and infrastructure. AFRY, COWI, NRC Group and other Nordic firms use it to halve the time on a study, rerun calculations in minutes, and catch errors that would otherwise slip through. Get in touch if you'd like to see what it can do for you.

Book demo