Each package is fine on its own

Anyone who coordinates consultants knows this. Each package holds together on its own, and the trouble sits between them: one assumes what another never carries, one is drawn on an outdated background. Nobody has the hours to read them against each other.

One case on our Try page: every consultant's construction documents, 275 sheets and pages. Yesper read them against each other and handed back 16 findings, each with sheet and revision. The big one: closers deleted at unit entry doors, citing a sprinkler system the code analysis doesn't show.

The questions go to the consultants with the set still on your desk. The contradiction shows up in the review, not in the field after the order is placed. Same for the rest of the Try page: a review protocol for a design package, the bid set against the construction set, quantities from an IFC model.

Try it yourself →

Benjamin Glaser Co-founder at Yesper. Writes about AI and the industry that builds the world. benjamin@yesper.ai

Yesper is the AI civil engineer for construction and infrastructure. AFRY, COWI, NRC Group and other Nordic firms use it to halve the time on a study, rerun calculations in minutes, and catch errors that would otherwise slip through. Get in touch if you'd like to see what it can do for you.

Book demo